Corindus, in collaboration with prominent interventional physicians, is committed to the continued publication of clinical data supporting the value and applicability of robotic-assistance in optimizing interventional procedures. The following peer-reviewed publications and abstracts cover the benefits of robotic-assisted intervention for precise measurement, protection from occupational hazards, and applicability in complex procedures among others.

Peer-Reviewed Publications


Mahmud E, et al. Robotic Peripheral Vascular Intervention With Drug-Coated Balloons is Feasible and Reduces Operator Radiation Exposure: Results of the Robotic-Assisted Peripheral Intervention for Peripheral Artery Disease (RAPID) Study II. J Invasive Cardiol. 2020; 32(10):380-384.


Madder R, et al. Robotic telestenting performance in transcontinental and regional pre‐clinical models. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;1-6. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29115.


Patel T, et al. Comparison of Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Traditional Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 13:e008888. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008888.


Mendes Pereira V, et al. First-in-human, robotic-assisted neuroendovascular intervention. J NeuroIntervent Surg 2020;0:338–340. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015671.rep.


Kagiyama K, et al. First Experience of Robotic-assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Japan. Intern Med Advance Publication. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3272–19.


Hirai T, et al. Initial report of safety and procedure duration of robotic‐assisted chronic total occlusion coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 1– 5.


Patel T, et al. Long Distance Tele-Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report of First-in-Human Experience. EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Sep.


Grantham JA, et al. A case of robotic assisted percutaneous coronary intervention of the left main coronary artery in a patient with very late baffle stenosis after surgical correction of anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun 27. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28382


Madder R, et al. Feasibility of Robotic Telestenting Over Long Geographical Distances: A Pre-clinical Ex Vivo and In Vivo Study. Eurointervention. 2019 Apr; Jaa-557.


Walters D, et al. Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Concept, Data, and Clinical Application. Intervent Cardiol Clin. 2019 Apr; 8(2):149-159.


Hamandi M, et al. Cost and Efficacy Analysis of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. JACC. 2019 Mar; 73(9):1114.


Al Nooryani A, et al. Rotate-on-Retract Procedural Automation for Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First Clinical Experience. Case Rep Cardiol. 2018 Dec 20;2018:6086034.


Mahmud, et al. Complex robotic compared to manual coronary interventions: 6- and 12-month outcomes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov;1–5.


Harrison, et al. Robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Reasons for partial manual assistance or manual conversion. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Jul;19(5 Pt A):526-531.


Smitson C, et al. Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Apr;30(4):152-156. Epub 2018 Jan 15.


Ragosta M, et al. Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Rationale, Implementation, Case Selection and Limitations of Current Technology. J Clin Med. 2018 Jan 30;7(2). pii: E23. doi: 10.3390/jcm7020023.


Rao S, et al. Robotic-assisted transradial diagnostic coronary angiography. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 4 January 2018; doi: 10.1002/ccd.27480.


Pourdjabbar A, et al. Robotics in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2017 Nov;15(11):825-833. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2017.1377071. Epub 2017 Sep 15.


Maor E, et al. Current and Future Use of Robotic Devices to Perform Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Review. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e006239. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006239.


Mahmud E, et al. Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). JACC Cardiovascular Interventions. 2017 Jul 11;10(13):1320-1327; DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.050.


Madder R, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention using a combination of robotics and telecommunications by an operator in a separate physical location from the patient: an early exploration into the feasibility of telestenting (the REMOTE-PCI study). EuroIntervention. 2017 Jan 20;12(13):1569-1576. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00363.


Madder R, et al. Impact of Robotics and a Suspended Lead Suit on Physician Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, 2016, ePub ahead of print. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.12.011.


Behnamfar O, et al. First Case of Robotic Percutaneous Vascular Intervention for Below-the-Knee Peripheral Arterial Disease. Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2016 Nov;28(11):E128-E131.


Mahmud E, et al. Feasibility and Safety of Robotic Peripheral Vascular Interventions: Results of the RAPID Trial. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):2058-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Sep 14.


Mahmud E, et al. First-in-Human Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main Stenosis. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2016 Oct;88(4):565-70. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26550.


Bezerra HG, et al. Longitudinal Geographic Miss (LGM) in Robotic Assisted Versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. Journal of Interventional Cardiology. 2015 Oct;28(5):449-55. doi: 10.1111/joic.12231.


Hasan F, et al. Robotically assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: benefits to the patient and the cardiologist, Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy. 2015;13:11, 1165-1168, DOI: 10.1586/14779072.2015.1091725


Campbell PT, et al. The impact of precise robotic lesion length measurement on stent length selection: Ramifications for stent savings. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Sep;16(6):348-50. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jul 9.


Campbell PT, et al. Interoperator and intraoperator (in) accuracy of stent selection based on visual estimation. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2015 December 1;86(7):1177-83. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25780. Epub 2015 Jan 23.


Smilowitz NR, et al. Robotic-Enhanced PCI Compared to the Traditional Manual Approach. Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2014 July;26(7):318-21.


Weisz G, et al. The association between experience and proficiency with robotic-enhanced coronary intervention-insights from the PRECISE multi-center study. Acute Cardiac Care Journal. 2014 June;16(2):37-40. doi:10.3109/17482941.2014.889314.


Magallon JC, et al. Robotic Assisted Coronary Intervention. In Thompson C. ed. Interventional Cardiology. Textbook of Cardiovascular Intervention 2014, pp 157-16, In print


Kapur V, et al. Complex robotic-enhanced percutaneous coronary intervention Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2014 May 1;83(6):915-21.doi: 10.1002/ccd.25271.


Smilowitz NR, et al. Occupational hazards of interventional cardiology. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 2013 Jul-Aug; 14: (4): 223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2013.05.002.


Weisz G, et al. Safety and Feasibility of Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - The Multi-Center Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention Study (PRECISE). Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013 Apr 16;61(15): 1596-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.045.


Carrozza, JP. Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention – Filling an Unmet Need. Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research. 2012 Feb;5(1): 62-6. doi: 10.1007/s12265-011-9324-9.


Smilowitz NR, et al. Robotic-assisted angioplasty: current status and future possibilities. Current Cardiology Reports. 2012 Oct;14(5):642-6. doi: 10.1007/s11886-012-0300-z.


Smilowitz NR, et al. Evaluating the use of robotically assisted PCI: A matter of being PRECISE. Interventional Cardiology. 2012; 4(5):501-3.


Weisz G. Medical Robotics – Not A Golem Anymore. Journal of Health & Medical Informatics. 2012; 3(3).


Granada JF, et al. First-in-human evaluation of a novel robotic-assisted coronary angioplasty system. Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2011 Aug;4(4):460-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.12.007.


Beyar R, et al. Remote control percutaneous coronary interventions: concept, validation, and first-in-humans pilot clinical trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2006 Jan;47(2):296-0. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.024. Epub Jan 4.


Beyar R, et al. Concept, design and pre-clinical studies for remote control percutaneous coronary interventions. EuroIntervention. 2005 Nov;1(3):340-5.