Corindus Vascular Robotics, in collaboration with prominent interventional physicians, is committed to the continued publication of clinical data supporting the value and applicability of robotic-assistance in optimizing PCI procedures. The following peer-reviewed publications and abstracts cover the benefits of robotic-assisted PCI for precise measurement, protection from occupational hazards, and applicability in complex PCI among others.
Hirai T, et al. Initial report of safety and procedure duration of robotic‐assisted chronic total occlusion coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 1– 5.
Patel T, et al. Long Distance Tele-Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report of First-in-Human Experience. EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Sep.
Grantham JA, et al. A case of robotic assisted percutaneous coronary intervention of the left main coronary artery in a patient with very late baffle stenosis after surgical correction of anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun 27. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28382
Madder R, et al. Feasibility of Robotic Telestenting Over Long Geographical Distances: A Pre-clinical Ex Vivo and In Vivo Study. Eurointervention. 2019 Apr; Jaa-557.
Walters D, et al. Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Concept, Data, and Clinical Application. Intervent Cardiol Clin. 2019 Apr; 8(2):149-159.
Hamandi M, et al. Cost and Efficacy Analysis of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. JACC. 2019 Mar; 73(9):1114.
Mahmud, et al. Complex robotic compared to manual coronary interventions: 6- and 12-month outcomes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov;1–5.
Harrison, et al. Robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Reasons for partial manual assistance or manual conversion. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Jul;19(5 Pt A):526-531.
Smitson C, et al. Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Apr;30(4):152-156. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
Ragosta M, et al. Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Rationale, Implementation, Case Selection and Limitations of Current Technology. J Clin Med. 2018 Jan 30;7(2). pii: E23. doi: 10.3390/jcm7020023.
Rao S, et al. Robotic-assisted transradial diagnostic coronary angiography. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 4 January 2018; doi: 10.1002/ccd.27480.
Pourdjabbar A, et al. Robotics in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2017 Nov;15(11):825-833. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2017.1377071. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
Maor E, et al. Current and Future Use of Robotic Devices to Perform Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Review. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e006239. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006239.
Mahmud E, et al. Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). JACC Cardiovascular Interventions. 2017 Jul 11;10(13):1320-1327; DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.050.
Madder R, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention using a combination of robotics and telecommunications by an operator in a separate physical location from the patient: an early exploration into the feasibility of telestenting (the REMOTE-PCI study). EuroIntervention. 2017 Jan 20;12(13):1569-1576. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00363.
Madder R, et al. Impact of Robotics and a Suspended Lead Suit on Physician Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, 2016, ePub ahead of print. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.12.011.
Behnamfar O, et al. First Case of Robotic Percutaneous Vascular Intervention for Below-the-Knee Peripheral Arterial Disease. Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2016 Nov;28(11):E128-E131.
Mahmud E, et al. Feasibility and Safety of Robotic Peripheral Vascular Interventions: Results of the RAPID Trial. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):2058-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
Mahmud E, et al. First-in-Human Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main Stenosis. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2016 Oct;88(4):565-70. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26550.
Bezerra HG, et al. Longitudinal Geographic Miss (LGM) in Robotic Assisted Versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. Journal of Interventional Cardiology. 2015 Oct;28(5):449-55. doi: 10.1111/joic.12231.
Hasan F, et al. Robotically assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: benefits to the patient and the cardiologist, Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy. 2015;13:11, 1165-1168, DOI: 10.1586/14779072.2015.1091725
Campbell PT, et al. The impact of precise robotic lesion length measurement on stent length selection: Ramifications for stent savings. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Sep;16(6):348-50. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
Campbell PT, et al. Interoperator and intraoperator (in) accuracy of stent selection based on visual estimation. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2015 December 1;86(7):1177-83. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25780. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
Smilowitz NR, et al. Robotic-Enhanced PCI Compared to the Traditional Manual Approach. Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2014 July;26(7):318-21.
Weisz G, et al. The association between experience and proficiency with robotic-enhanced coronary intervention-insights from the PRECISE multi-center study. Acute Cardiac Care Journal. 2014 June;16(2):37-40. doi:10.3109/17482941.2014.889314.
Magallon JC, et al. Robotic Assisted Coronary Intervention. In Thompson C. ed. Interventional Cardiology. Textbook of Cardiovascular Intervention 2014, pp 157-16, In print
Kapur V, et al. Complex robotic-enhanced percutaneous coronary intervention Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2014 May 1;83(6):915-21.doi: 10.1002/ccd.25271.
Smilowitz NR, et al. Occupational hazards of interventional cardiology. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 2013 Jul-Aug; 14: (4): 223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2013.05.002.
Weisz G, et al. Safety and Feasibility of Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - The Multi-Center Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention Study (PRECISE). Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013 Apr 16;61(15): 1596-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.045.
Carrozza, JP. Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention – Filling an Unmet Need. Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research. 2012 Feb;5(1): 62-6. doi: 10.1007/s12265-011-9324-9.
Smilowitz NR, et al. Robotic-assisted angioplasty: current status and future possibilities. Current Cardiology Reports. 2012 Oct;14(5):642-6. doi: 10.1007/s11886-012-0300-z.
Smilowitz NR, et al. Evaluating the use of robotically assisted PCI: A matter of being PRECISE. Interventional Cardiology. 2012; 4(5):501-3.
Weisz G. Medical Robotics – Not A Golem Anymore. Journal of Health & Medical Informatics. 2012; 3(3).
Granada JF, et al. First-in-human evaluation of a novel robotic-assisted coronary angioplasty system. Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2011 Aug;4(4):460-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.12.007.
Beyar R, et al. Remote control percutaneous coronary interventions: concept, validation, and first-in-humans pilot clinical trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2006 Jan;47(2):296-0. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.024. Epub Jan 4.
Beyar R, et al. Concept, design and pre-clinical studies for remote control percutaneous coronary interventions. EuroIntervention. 2005 Nov;1(3):340-5.